Index

Our Hats Off to The New York Times, Urofsky, and the Need for History and Sociology

W.K.

Have you been sifting the resources of sociology, the discipline of how we do our thinking on matters that concern society as a whole? The dilemma: that in turn requires information, and that in turn requires nurturing and indeed designing our thinkers, which brings in our universities, and government funding, and these are moving on legs bucking under them financially from hips to toes. Even the most illustrious, which would include the Times very near the top, are having their troubles, with the common stock bought by business magnates and only special shares held by the original family founders. And advertising revenue continues downhill, from the position as special shares looking after the reputation of the papers. That is every further input of vital input – even on the past history of depressions and banking and how the US and the world eventually found their way out of the Depression, is something that has to be pumped up in the midst of failing finance arrangements. That is why our hats off to The Times for restoring to us a further cut of our crucial history (07/02, "The Value of ‘Other People’s Money’" by Melvin I. Urofsky). In fact it merited a subheadline, "The Value of our History."

"Gaithersburg, MD – Some things never change. When President Obama spoke last week of ‘shameful’ bonuses for bankers and the financial community’s ‘irresponsibility’ he echoed charges leveled nearly a century ago by Louis D. Brandeis. Brandeis, a commercial lawyer, leading reformer and future Supreme Court Justice, described a dangerous combination in Other People’s Money and How the Bankers Use It, one of the best-known exposes of the Progressive era.

"Published in 1914, the book was based on the revelations of the House of Representatives’ Pujo Committee about the predatory practices of J.P. Morgan and other big bankers. Other People’s Money influenced both Woodrow Wilson’s New Freedom agenda and Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal. It also offers valuable lessons for today.

"Our current crisis, after all, was in part fueled by bankers making big gambles with other people’s cash. They bundled and sold sub-prime mortgages, took their profits, and then left others holding portfolios full of worthless, even toxic, paper. That was exactly the kind of behavior Brandeis despised. He believed it was one thing for an individual to put up capital in risky adventures, playing to win but prepared for failure. But he saw the bankers of his time dodging failure by manipulating the marketplace at the expense of small entrepreneurs and consumers.

"As president, Wilson tried to put a stop to this. He read the book and called Brandeis in to help draft three bills crucial to the New Freedom agenda – the Federal Reserve Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act, and the law establishing the Federal Trade Commission. These measures allowed Congress to take away banks’ control over currency, banned interlocking directorates (in which banker representatives controlled other corporations) and established rules of fair competition.

"Banks found it relatively easy to get around these rules in the 1920s, especially with Republican administrations that did not seem to believe in market regulation. Bankers promoted the purchase of stock on low margins or down payments, often as little as 10% of the price, and then financed the difference by loans, while their brokerage divisions sold the stocks. Then the stock market collapsed in the fall of 1929, taking the banking system down with it.

"During the Great Depression, people turned to Brandeis once again. Other People’s Money was reissued in an inexpensive edition, and many of those who came to Washington to work on Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal read it. The New Deal Laws, particularly the Glass-Steagall and the Securities Exchange Acts, imposed long overdue regulation of the banking system, required the separation of banking from stock brokerage, and established the Securities and Exchange Commission to regulate the stock markets.

"For Brandeis, regulation was not supposed to be a restraint on renovation or the entrepreneurial spirit, but rather a check on unbridled greed. He believed in a free market, but one in which the government enforced rules of fair competition so that the most talented could succeed. Clear rule would help ensure that business was conducted fairly and openly.

"Other People’s Money can help us navigate the new era of regulation that we are likely to enter. It would be wise for Mr. Obama to heed Mr. Brandeis’s advice before imposing stricter rules on banking and the stock market. For these plans to be effective, Brandeis would caution, they must be more than cosmetic. Government should oppose banks’ purchases of stock brokerages, for example, to avoid the problems that Brandeis exposed. Furthermore, new rules won’t accomplish much without effective watch-dog agencies. The Securities and Exchange Commission, for example, seems to have abandoned its oversight responsibilities during the Bush years, and now we are paying the price.

"As we reel from the financial crisis, Other People’s Money and similar indictments of immoral banking behavior will likely find a new audience. Some of the trouble-making bankers will, perhaps, be temporarily chastened. But before we know it, they will once again be complaining about regulation’s ‘interference’ with the market. Don’t listen to them. Good regulation will keep us from losing sight of the importance of those same principles that Brandeis emphasized so many years ago – honesty, openness and a fair playing field."

W.K.

Melvin I. Urofsky is a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University and the author of the forthcoming Louis D. Brandeis: A Life.

- from Economic Reform, February 2009

Next